Regarding the case study “You Can’t Keep a Good Man Down: On Being a Man and Being a Victim” by Kathleen Burke (2004), this analysis aims to highlight the research problem the author tackles. Moreover, this brief examination, that has been possible only with the help of the original research paper writing service, views the main points the study makes in the context of social control. In completing this exercise, an analysis of the author’s thoughts on how the research topic relates to social control will suffice.
The study under Gender, sexuality and the law focuses on the problem of the link between masculinities and victimization. Furthermore, there is recognition that men avoid reporting or accepting some forms of victimization especially male sexual assault. The problem this paper addresses is the role of masculinity in how the state tackles male child sexual abuse.
Social control in the context of the study applies to the perspectives on the ideal gender role and its enforcement in the victims’ and states response to male child sexual abuse. Gender ascribes Masculinity to men governing how they respond to victimization and how legal institutions perceive male victims. Gender stereotypes directing the ideal masculine behavior including emotional detachment, physical aggressiveness, heterosexuality, and sexual potency are elements guiding the response to male sexual abuse. Further, the norm of the perception of sexual aggressiveness and strength in men work to the determent of victims.
The state as an institution of social control in utilizing the law as sanction also plays a significant role in addressing male victimization and male child abuse. Laws on rape and homosexuality are typical of a patriarchal control system. These rules assume offenders in sexual victimization are male and victims, female, not adequately providing for instances of targeting of men. Moreover, criminal justice officials in their masculinism fail to relate to male victims either approaching them with notions of the homosexual nature of their situations or the minimalizing of the severity of their position. Gender figures in the law’s association of masculinity with invulnerability, disadvantaging male child sexual abuse victims.
In conclusion, the study demonstrates how social control mechanisms inherent in perceptions of ideal masculinity affect victimization in male child sexual abuse. Preconceptions about the typical masculine approach to victimization are responsible for the state’s negative response to male sexual abuse.